“But that’s not the way the law is written, and that’s not how the 6th Circuit saw the case.”
When asked about the impact of the law, Hasson said she thinks it will be “far-reaching either way it goes.”
“But the concern here is because the question presented is limited to the equal protection analysis, that really drills down to the heart of the matter,” she explained. “So, we are going to see those on the left who are trying to elevate transgender identification into its own protected classification. They are going to be pulling out all the stops and making their best arguments.”
Hasson said it is “an even-handed law” that “doesn’t single out anyone.”
“The Constitution is very clear: States have the power to enact laws that are designed to protect children,” she noted.
When asked what is at stake, Hasson noted that the Tennessee law extended the statute of limitations for those who were harmed by transgender procedures, giving victims the right to sue for 30 years after they reach 18.
“One of the things we’ve seen with young people who have gone through these gender transition procedures, they, and often their parents, really didn’t understand the risks — they weren’t explained well,” she said.
“And it’s not sometimes until they’re of age or mid-20s, even, that they begin to realize what has been done to them.”
The extended statute of limitations “allows for that growth and maturity and that chance to recognize the real harm that’s been done,” Hasson noted.
“And that’s a powerful thing,” she continued. “That will be a disincentive in itself. So, I hope that the court will do the right thing. The law certainly supports the 6th Circuit decision, and we will see where things land.”
Credit: Source link
