“In addition to responding to the questions posed by the law firm, this also demanded reading and analyzing almost 8,000 pages of documents in digital format,” he said.
“These assistants then helped me to study and analyze the almost 2,000 pages of expert opinions.”
He said that the error concerning his presence at the meeting did not “detract from the care and diligence” shown by his collaborators.
Analysis of the Munich report’s criticisms
In their 1,300-word analysis of the Munich abuse report, Benedict XVI’s advisers defended his actions in all four cases highlighted by the study.
They insisted that at the time of the 1980 meeting, the future pope was not aware that Hullermann — who they identified only as “Priest X.” — was an abuser or that he would be admitted to “pastoral activity” in the Munich archdiocese.
“It was exclusively a question of the accommodation of the young Priest X. in Munich because he had to undergo therapy there. This request was complied with,” said the text signed by the legal experts Stefan Mückl, Helmuth Pree, Stefan Korta, and Carsten Brennecke.
“During the meeting, the reason for the therapy was not mentioned. It was therefore not decided at the meeting to engage the abuser in pastoral work.”
The advisers underlined that Benedict XVI “did not lie or knowingly make a false statement” regarding the meeting and said that the mistake was the result of a “transcription error.”
“One cannot impute this transcription error to Benedict XVI as a conscious false statement or ‘lie,’” the advisers insisted.
They also denied that the retired pope knew at the time that the priests in the other three cases were abusers.
“In none of the cases analyzed by the expert report was Joseph Ratzinger aware of sexual abuse committed or suspicion of sexual abuse committed by priests,” they wrote. “The expert report provides no evidence to the contrary.”
They also responded to widespread criticism that the pope emeritus had downplayed the “exhibitionist behavior” of a priest in one of the cases.
“In the memoir [82-page statement], in fact, Benedict XVI says with the utmost clarity that abuses, including exhibitionism, are ‘terrible,’ ‘sinful,’ ‘morally reprehensible,’ and ‘irreparable,’” they noted.
“In the canonical evaluation of the event, inserted into the memoir by us, the collaborators, and expressed according to our judgment, there was only a desire to recall that according to the canon law then in force, exhibitionism was not a crime in the restricted sense, because the relevant penal norm did not include in the case in point behavior of that type.”
Benedict XVI’s record as pope
After leaving the Munich archdiocese in 1982, the future Benedict XVI served as prefect of the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith before his election as pope in 2005.
During his almost eight-year pontificate, he dismissed hundreds of abusers from the clerical state, met abuse survivors during his foreign trips, and addressed the abuse crisis in Ireland in a landmark pastoral letter.
He retired in 2013 and has since lived in relative seclusion at the Vatican.
The Vatican published an editorial on the Munich abuse report on Jan. 26 highlighting Benedict XVI’s role in combating clerical abuse.
The editorial, signed by Andrea Tornielli, the editorial director of the Vatican’s Dicastery for Communication, cautioned against “the search for easy scapegoats and summary judgments.”
He wrote: “It was Benedict XVI, even against the opinion of many self-styled ‘Ratzingerians,’ who upheld, in the midst of the storm of scandals in Ireland and Germany, the face of a penitential Church, which humbles itself in asking for forgiveness, which feels dismay, remorse, pain, compassion, and closeness.”
In a second editorial published on Tuesday, Tornielli described Benedict’s letter as “brief and heartfelt.”
“The words of Benedict XVI in the letter are those of a helpless old man, who now senses the nearness of the encounter with God whose name is mercy. They are the words of a ‘humble worker in the vineyard of the Lord,’ who sincerely asks for forgiveness without escaping the concreteness of problems, and invites the whole Church to feel the bleeding wound of abuse as its own,” he wrote.
The ‘hour of judgment’
Concluding his letter, Benedict, who turns 95 on April 16, looked ahead to his judgment before God.
“Quite soon, I shall find myself before the final judge of my life. Even though, as I look back on my long life, I can have great reason for fear and trembling, I am nonetheless of good cheer, for I trust firmly that the Lord is not only the just judge, but also the friend and brother who himself has already suffered for my shortcomings, and is thus also my advocate, my ‘Paraclete,’” he wrote.
“In light of the hour of judgment, the grace of being a Christian becomes all the more clear to me. It grants me knowledge, and indeed friendship, with the judge of my life, and thus allows me to pass confidently through the dark door of death.”
“In this regard, I am constantly reminded of what John tells us at the beginning of the Apocalypse: he sees the Son of Man in all his grandeur and falls at his feet as though dead. Yet He, placing his right hand on him, says to him: ‘Do not be afraid! It is I…’”
Credit: Source link
